Government beer ?!

Published Thursday March 19th, 2009

Wading into the ANBL Selection beer vat, looking for answers.

A1

I’ve heard of government cheese, but how would you like to wash it down with some government beer?
Too much media attention has already been paid to the ANBL’s decision to release their “own” beer, but I’ve fielded so many questions about it the past week, and been involved in so many discussions about it over a pint of beer (something with heft, unlike their Selection (Sélection) Lager or Light), that I felt I needed to summarize the lot in what’s hopefully the last article about the subject.
Many have been asking why the ANBL would want to compete with their own customers. Many others have wondered why Molson and Labatt haven’t expressed outrage over Moosehead getting the contract to brew both brands. Most everyone is curious about how they can sell the beer for less money than other mainstream beers and still pay Moosehead enough for it to make it worth their while. And some have even inquired about the taste of the brands.
I tasted it for the first time live on CBC Radio, during The Current, on the beer release day March 12 (you can listen to that show online in the show archives at http://www.cbc.ca/thecurrent).
My conclusion was essentially that these are fizzy mass-market beers, slightly vegetal, and hard to tell apart. The initial taste is very bland and soft with no noticeable bitterness. Like their competitors, there’s way too much carbonation. These are very light smelling and tasting beers that would appeal to people who enjoy the lighter tasting Moosehead brands, as well as Budweiser. I re-tasted them blind in a flight alongside Budweiser, Moosehead Green, Coors Light, Moosehead Light and Cold Filtered Light. The only two in the flight that stood out were Moose Green and Coors Light, both of which have more hop flavour. I could have sworn Cold Filtered Light and Selection Light were the same beer. No matter.
The original website for the beer (http://www.selectionlager.ca) had the following statement on the ingredients and process section: “We use only four ingredients to brew Selection Lager and Selection Light: malt (barley), hops, water and yeast.” After tasting the beer, and knowing a bit about how Moosehead makes beer, I e-mailed ANBL and informed them that this brew no doubt used lots of corn, making the website incorrect. Not long after, the website was edited to include corn syrup in the ingredients.
In case you think this is irrelevant, you should know that corn is used to make beer lighter bodied, easier to brew, and cheaper. Most craft beer uses 100 per cent barley as the source of sugar, and this is part of the reason they’re more expensive. Why didn’t they know what their beer was made of?
As for the reason to make these discount beers at all, there’s some confusion. The ANBL initially said it was to stem the flow of beer from across the Quebec border, but everyone quickly pointed out that three or four dollars off the regular price wouldn’t be enough. I asked ANBL’s Manager Nora Lacey, Corporate Services and Communications, about this.
“It was never NB Liquor’s intention that this beer would stem the cross-border issue,” explains Lacey. “The opportunity in launching these beers is to stimulate activity in the domestic beer category which we believe will help stem/reverse the volume loss.” The ANBL met with the four major brewers (Moosehead, Molson, Labatt, Sleeman) about the volume loss issue some time ago, and came up with the plan to make discount beer. They asked for bids from these brewers, without including the smaller Northampton and Pump House breweries. Both Shaun Fraser of Pump House and Sean Dunbar of Northampton had bad reactions to this whole business. I asked Dunbar what it feels like to have his client compete with him.
“They can bring in all the cheap crappy beer in the world and it will not cross over into our tiny sector of the market,” answers Dunbar. “I wish that, instead of pursuing this sort of thing, ANBL would take their beer category more seriously, from a beer perspective. I wish they’d treat it like the wine category and endeavor to create, in our little province, the most interesting and progressive beer jurisdiction in Canada.” That makes sense, but even if it doesn’t affect their sales by direct competition, there might be an impact on Northampton’s presence in the stores. Right now the ANBL brands are front and centre, but what about after this launch? Will the beer take the best spot in the cold room, or will it go to the back of the cooler with other marginal brands? Floor space is very important to breweries.
Shaun Fraser complained in the media about why Pump House was not given a chance to bid on brewing. Lacey explains that “NB Liquor consulted with the four major domestic brewers on the beer volume issue. From those discussions, NB Liquor chose to start with one option, that of launching two everyday low-cost, high quality ‘value’ brands. NB Liquor continues to work with the other three brewers on their proposals to tackle the volume issue. The issue is not a micro/imported beer issue.” When asked why they don’t just open the borders, Lacey has a quick response, saying, “Opening the borders would be a federal decision. NB Liquor and the Nova Scotia Liquor Commission currently have very good bi-lateral relations in place i.e. Maritime Beer Accord.”
Others have speculated that this new beer is a sweetheart deal for Moosehead. It drives their volume preferentially, with the ANBL doing the marketing and putting the beer front and centre in stores, with its lower price. Keeping their brewery at or close to capacity is very important for Moosehead, and any brewery.
Meanwhile Moosehead makes good money on it, as they’re not doing the costly marketing, such as in-store promotions, giveaways, TV and print ads. Why haven’t Molson and Labatt been squawking about unfair treatment in the media? Could it be that they don’t want to damage relations with the ANBL, a huge client? Maybe they have a payback coming of their own.
All these issues and the nebulous answers to the questions point to a mess. Although the new beers were moving quickly on launch day, one wonders how many people will be buying them in the heat of summer, when beer sales peak, other beers take their turns on sale, and the breweries start to think about really making money. If it’s only Moosehead smiling among the breweries at that time, then we’ll know that at least they believe in government beer.

 

Disabled

Commenting has been disabled for this item. Existing comments appear below but you may not add a new comment at this time.

Comments (9)

All comments are subject to the site Terms of Use. For a full commenting tutorial click here.

Our editorial team relies on filtering technology and our visitor community to identify inappropriate comments. In the event that a site user has submitted offensive content that has evaded our filter, please select the option to Flag As Inappropriate presented within the comment. Thank you for helping to keep this site clean.

Gee, do you think we’ve heard enough from Craig Pinhey about the new Selection beers? He seems more interested in using this story to push his personal taste in beer (micro brewed swill) than he is in discussing the NB government’s ludicrous move to directly compete with private enterprise. You’re really starting to drive me to drink Craig and it just might be one of those “government beers”!
35
Thumbs Up
17
Thumbs Down
Jack Clark, Moncton on 20/03/09 08:31:52 PM AST
Microbrewed swill, huh?
That's just great.
17
Thumbs Up
28
Thumbs Down
Craig P., Rothesay on 21/03/09 10:37:53 AM AST
No offense Craig, I've just heard too much about Selection Beer in the media lately, and much of it is from you. As you can tell, I'm a bit of a beer critic too and if you need an explanation for my micro-brewed "swill" comment, see today's on-line article about beer in Saint John's TJ. Because you really can't argue "taste" I rarely mention brand names and prefer to keep my comments/opinions generic.
22
Thumbs Up
11
Thumbs Down
Jack Clark, Moncton on 21/03/09 12:46:32 PM AST
I'm just doing my job. I have to cover that story. even if I can't stand the whole concept of the ANBL releasing a beer. But your comment about "microbrewed swill" shows extreme beer ignorance.
14
Thumbs Up
18
Thumbs Down
Craig Pinhey, Rothesay on 21/03/09 09:36:46 PM AST
One more thing. What online beer article are you referring to, Jack? The one about sales #'s in NB? That was interesting. Anyway, I don't know who you are. Did you write something somewhere? Are you a beer judge or beer writer that I just haven't crossed paths with? BTW if your comments and opinions are generic, then is that the kind of beer you like, too? I'm just kidding, but that was too good a set-up.
And yes, you most certainly can argue taste. We do it all the time in my profession. If you can't argue taste, then why do we bother making more than one type of food? Let's all eat mush (or drink Bud)
12
Thumbs Up
18
Thumbs Down
Craig Pinhey, Rothesay on 21/03/09 09:46:20 PM AST
Craig; I appreciate your reply. The TJ article is called “Beer Season”. The article itself was fine, but some things said by one of the Shauns regarding the quality of main-stream beers really irked me. Read it and you’ll see. You’ll also note that I happened to prefer a “good” micro beer; my point was that they’re not all good - some are grotesque. I no doubt went over the top with my “micro-brew swill” comment, but that’s what happens when you try to make a point while remaining generic.

To answer your questions; I don’t recall ever meeting you. I’m not a beer writer; however I have extensive knowledge & experience on the subject, and have done my share of flavour “evaluations”.

To argue is to offer facts/assertions as evidence that something is true. With taste being a personal thing, your truth will likely differ from someone else. aka “I know what I like”. I would suggest that arguing about taste is unproductive while exchanging views/opinions is always welcome.

20
Thumbs Up
5
Thumbs Down
Jack Clark, Moncton on 22/03/09 01:04:55 PM AST
So, are you a Molson or other brewery employee? I think I've met all the serious beer geeks/judges/homebrewers around here...it just seems like you have an agenda. But it is hidden. I have an agenda too, but it is not hidden. I am a certified beer judge and I love good beer. I know how to brew it - i competed nationally for years. I understand and can identify beer defects (and yes, craft beers have them more often, but that is the price you pay for having flavour). I want people to drink better beer instead of watered down, over marketed, watery stuff made with far too much adjunct. You say you are an expert. What are your qualifications? I'm curious, seriously. I love tasting beer with experts, and I would love to include you in a taste panel for an article if you are an independent beer expert with a great palate. But if you are a plant from one of the big brewers, fomenting dissention here with anti craft beer views, then you should stop doing it.
12
Thumbs Up
15
Thumbs Down
Craig Pinhey, Rothesay on 26/03/09 12:37:01 AM AST
Sorry to disappoint you Craig, but there’s no agenda, no Molson employee (wish I was) & thus no conspiracy. I would however question your motive given your propensity for trashing big breweries. I thought beer judges were not to allow their personal preferences to interfere with their evaluations? As for me, I’m just a beer enthusiast with an opinion. As a blogger, the content of my resume is irrelevant; although I am sufficiently educated to hold my own in a beer discussion. As for being anti-craft beer, you couldn’t be more wrong. Although I drink all beer types, my preference is NOT for the “watery” stuff, but rather a good quality craft beer (Picaroon’s Best Bitter & McAuslan’s Oatmeal Stout). The point I was trying to make was that not all craft beers are great (as was implied) and not all main-streams are low quality/crap (as was stated). I wasn’t generalizing; I was stating a fact. Thanks for your invitation to taste, but I’m not sure if I’m quite ready for primetime – Cheers
2
Thumbs Up
1
Thumbs Down
Jack Clark, Moncton on 28/03/09 11:34:17 AM AST
Craig: If you’re really serious about helping the public “drink better” you could start with educating them on the taste of “fresh” beer? I’m not using fresh tasting as defined by a beer marketer, but as lacking the characters associated with oxidation (paper, cardboard, sweet, cooked, etc). Beer is a food product and doesn’t improve by aging in the package; particularly if it was exposed to dissolved oxygen during brewing, conditioning & packaging, OR if the package was mistreated during storage/handling (temperature, time, agitation). It’s even worse when you’re paying a premium price for an import that’s 6-9 months old and so gross that you can hardly choke it down.
2
Thumbs Up
0
Thumbs Down
Jack Clark, Moncton on 28/03/09 11:41:01 AM AST
Advertisement
Advertisement

Search Articles